This morning I was preparing some material for my "Music in the Elementary Classroom" course. We are about to begin our music and movement unit and I wanted to re-read the articles I assign to my students. I came across the name of Susanne Langer and like Dan, I thought to myself, "Why have I never heard of this person before?"
I began searching through WVU libraries online to learn more. According to the Encyclopedia of Religion (Lyon, 2005), Langer was an influential German-American philosopher who wrote on symbols, myth, and aesthetic experiences.
The article I was preparing in class mentioned Langer in relation to her 1953 book, Feeling and Form: A Theory of Art. Her work suggests that symbolic forms can manifest in more ways than in words, such as art pieces and dance. Language is limited by form and cannot express the full extent of emotion as well as music and paintings can (Lyon, 2005).
Like many women philosophers of the mid-twentieth century, Langer faced resistance and her work was and remains under-recognized (Lyon, 2005).
Although I do not have much to say about Langer today, I look forward to reading more about her and understanding the implications of her ideas for music education. This was an unexpected and happy exploration today!
References
Lyon, A. (2005). Susanne Langer. In L. Jones (Ed.)., Encyclopedia of Religion. (3rd ed., Vol. 8., pp. 5300-5301). Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference USA.
A blog dedicated to discussing marginalized people in music education. The focus will begin with women in music education.
Monday, March 25, 2013
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Satis Coleman 1, Dan Shevock
Satis Coleman... some thoughts...
I initially became interested in Satis Coleman when I saw a reference to her in something I was reading about improvisation. A jstor search led me to Volk's 1996 MEJ article on Coleman. I was intrigued. From what I have read--Volk's MEJ article, Southcott's (2009) the Seeking Attitude, and Coleman's own books--my interest and esteem in Coleman as an important music educator has only increased. This interest is connected in my love of improvisation, and my appreciation for the philosophy of John Dewey.
"Interest" is a central concept in Deweyan educational philosophy (Dewey, 1910). Continuity demands that educative experiences be rooted in children's interest, and Coleman's unique way of attending to student interest--taking students on field trips to the Metropolitan Museum of Art where they looked at instruments from a variety of world cultures (Volk describes this as a precursor to "world music"), then returning to school so that students could build instruments and then perform on them--seems fresh and modern in 2013. This way of teaching seems outright radical for the 1920s. I cannot for the life of me imagine why Coleman's name isn't on the tip of every music educator's tongue.
One aspect of my own paper makes connections between Coleman's writings, which include improvisation, "primitive music for little primitives" and mother tongue, and similar ideas later made popular in American music education by music educators Carl Orff and Shin'ichi Suzuki. So my question is, why was Coleman's voice lost between the 1940s when she retired from the Lincoln Lab School, and the 1990s? Would her teachings have been more readily accepted if she were a man? As I read her, I am constantly stunned by the profundity of her writing, thinking, and philosophizing. A copy of the poster I presented at the Penn State Graduate Exhibition today is on my weebly page, http://danshevock.weebly.com/research.html. ...
Challenge: What other voices have been lost to our gendered music education history? ...
Dan Shevock
Ph.D. Student, Penn State
3/24/2013...
References
Coleman, S. N. (1922). Creative music for children: A plan of training based on the natural evolution of music including the making and playing of instruments. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Coleman, S. N. (1939). Your child’s music. New York, NY: Van Rees Press.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath & Co. Publishers. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37423/37423-h/37423-h.htm.
Southcott, J. (2009). The seeking attitude: Ideas that influenced Satis N. Coleman. Journal of Historical Research in Music Education, 31(1), 20-36.
Volk, T. M. (1996). Satis Coleman’s “Creative Music”: Hands-on music education for children was the goal of the innovative music educator Satis Coleman. Her legacy enriches today’s classrooms. Music Educators Journal. 82, 31-47. DOI: 10.2307/3398949.
I initially became interested in Satis Coleman when I saw a reference to her in something I was reading about improvisation. A jstor search led me to Volk's 1996 MEJ article on Coleman. I was intrigued. From what I have read--Volk's MEJ article, Southcott's (2009) the Seeking Attitude, and Coleman's own books--my interest and esteem in Coleman as an important music educator has only increased. This interest is connected in my love of improvisation, and my appreciation for the philosophy of John Dewey.
"Interest" is a central concept in Deweyan educational philosophy (Dewey, 1910). Continuity demands that educative experiences be rooted in children's interest, and Coleman's unique way of attending to student interest--taking students on field trips to the Metropolitan Museum of Art where they looked at instruments from a variety of world cultures (Volk describes this as a precursor to "world music"), then returning to school so that students could build instruments and then perform on them--seems fresh and modern in 2013. This way of teaching seems outright radical for the 1920s. I cannot for the life of me imagine why Coleman's name isn't on the tip of every music educator's tongue.
One aspect of my own paper makes connections between Coleman's writings, which include improvisation, "primitive music for little primitives" and mother tongue, and similar ideas later made popular in American music education by music educators Carl Orff and Shin'ichi Suzuki. So my question is, why was Coleman's voice lost between the 1940s when she retired from the Lincoln Lab School, and the 1990s? Would her teachings have been more readily accepted if she were a man? As I read her, I am constantly stunned by the profundity of her writing, thinking, and philosophizing. A copy of the poster I presented at the Penn State Graduate Exhibition today is on my weebly page, http://danshevock.weebly.com/research.html. ...
Challenge: What other voices have been lost to our gendered music education history? ...
Dan Shevock
Ph.D. Student, Penn State
3/24/2013...
References
Coleman, S. N. (1922). Creative music for children: A plan of training based on the natural evolution of music including the making and playing of instruments. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Coleman, S. N. (1939). Your child’s music. New York, NY: Van Rees Press.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath & Co. Publishers. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37423/37423-h/37423-h.htm.
Southcott, J. (2009). The seeking attitude: Ideas that influenced Satis N. Coleman. Journal of Historical Research in Music Education, 31(1), 20-36.
Volk, T. M. (1996). Satis Coleman’s “Creative Music”: Hands-on music education for children was the goal of the innovative music educator Satis Coleman. Her legacy enriches today’s classrooms. Music Educators Journal. 82, 31-47. DOI: 10.2307/3398949.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)